Skip to main content

Peliqan

data-warehouse-vs-data-lake-vs-lakehouse-feature-image

Data warehouse vs data lake vs lakehouse

InfoGraphics

Related Diagrams

Peliqan data platform

All-in-one Data Platform

Built-in data warehouse, superior data activation capabilities, and AI-powered development assistance.

data-warehouse-vs-data-lake-vs-lakehouse-diagram

The three are usually compared on cost or scale. The difference that actually decides which one you want is when you commit to a schema, because that determines what you can still ask later.

The three, side by side

  1. 1Data warehouse – structure first. Schema is applied on write, so only structured, modelled data gets in. Best for BI and finance-grade numbers. Watch out for the rework when the questions change, because reshaping means reloading.
  2. 2Data lake – store first. Schema is applied on read, so anything can land: raw, semi-structured and unstructured. Best for data science and cheap long retention. Watch out for it becoming a swamp, which is what happens without a catalogue.
  3. 3Lakehouse – both, on one copy. Raw files with table formats layered over them, giving ACID tables on top of open storage. Best when one copy has to serve BI and machine learning together. Watch out for the extra moving parts you now operate.

How to choose

  • Structured sources and reporting as the main job – warehouse
  • Large volumes of semi-structured data and exploratory work – lake
  • Both audiences arguing over one copy of the data – lakehouse
  • Not sure yet – start with a warehouse and keep a raw layer, which gets you most of the lake’s optionality without the operational load

Schema on write versus schema on read

Schema on write buys you trust: anything in the warehouse has already passed a shape check. Schema on read buys you optionality: you keep everything and decide later. Because the first is easier to govern and the second is easier to change, the lakehouse exists to try to get both, at the price of more machinery to run.

Where Peliqan sits

Peliqan loads from 300+ sources into a warehouse it can provide or into one you already run, and keeps a raw layer alongside the modelled tables. Consequently you get the replayability people usually reach for a lake to get, without operating a second system. The layer view is drawn out on our data warehouse architecture diagram.

Use this diagram wherever you like

The diagram is free to use, including commercially, as long as there is a visible link back to this page. Download the PNG for slides and documents, or the SVG if you want to edit the labels. No email required. You can browse the rest of the set in the Peliqan diagram library.

Ready to build this on your own data? Get started with Peliqan.

FAQs

When the schema is applied. A warehouse applies it on write, so only modelled data gets in. A lake applies it on read, so anything can land and you decide the shape later.

It is a lake with a table format over the files, which adds ACID transactions and schema enforcement. That is what lets BI tools query it as if it were a warehouse.

Usually not. Running both means two copies, two sets of access rules and two answers to the same question. A warehouse with a raw layer covers most of the same ground.

Object storage in a lake is cheapest per terabyte, but cost tends to move to compute and to the engineering time spent making the data usable.

Get instant access to all your company data

Connect 300+ sources, serve any BI tool, and give every AI agent one governed endpoint to read, and write back where the app supports it.